Step 1
Understand and decide
A sourced summary, requirements, documents and showstoppers: decide whether a bid is worth preparing.
From tender spotted to bid prepared
See what your bid file can contain.
Understanding the obligations, writing from your evidence and pricing every line: this example shows the intended work, all the way to a complete file ready for your approval.
Support matched to your file and your budget
Step 2
Prepare the technical proposal
Organisation, method, schedule, quality and environment, based on your company's resources and evidence.
Step 3
Price every line
Detailed price schedule and calculations based on the quantities in the file and your confirmed costs. You approve your prices.
Step 4
Assemble the file for approval
Technical proposal, compliance matrix, documented annexes and financial part, brought together for your review before signature and submission.
These levels are confirmed according to the tender, the documents available and our preparation capacity. The full chain of assisted drafting and delivery has yet to be demonstrated in a pilot. Your budget may limit our involvement to the analysis; it never removes a mandatory requirement.
You confirm your resources, references, prices and commitments. Your authorised representative approves, signs and submits. Our support covers preparing the bid, not carrying out the works on your behalf.
The technical proposal, point by point
Method and resources
Site survey, access checks, protection, compatible products, cleaning of glass surfaces and frames, self-inspection and handover. Staff, qualifications and equipment must be evidenced by the company; no fictitious resource is presented as available.
Schedule and continuity
Organisation by facility, occupancy constraints, prior notice, written approval and cover for absences. The proposed timetable depends on the resources actually available.
Quality and acceptance
Inspection grid by area, follow-up of snags, rework and job sheet. Expected results are linked to the clauses of the file, without inventing an imposed correction period.
Products and environment
Product data sheets, safety data sheets and evidence of labels or equivalence, dosage, packaging and consumption. An environmental claim needs proof, not just persuasive wording.
| Requirement | Source | How the example handles it |
|---|---|---|
| Mandatory site visit | RC p. 6, art. 2.7 | Certificate missing in the example. No certificate is fabricated. |
| Application and capabilities | RC p. 7–8 | Identity, insurance, references, resources and powers of attorney to be supplied by the real company. |
| Technical proposal and bid documents | RC p. 8–10 | AE, BPU, DQE, schedule, products, equipment, method and quality monitoring to be reconciled. |
| Technical, price, environment | RC p. 9–10 | Weighting 50%, 40%, 10%. No invented score or probability of winning. |
| Window cleaning and access | CCTP p. 13–15 | Inside and outside faces, frames, suitable equipment and safety to be confirmed by the professional. |
| Schedule and acceptance | CCTP p. 14–15 | Written notice at least 15 days in advance, written approval and countersigned job sheets. |
| Products and supporting evidence | CCTP p. 16–17 | Technical sheets, safety sheets and environmental characteristics documented. No label is assumed. |
| Unit prices and quantities | BPU/DQE lot 3 p. 1 | 22 lines, 21 quantities of 2 and GS3 potentially 1. The DQE guarantees no order. |
22 lines, one verifiable calculation
Descriptions, units and quantities come from the official BPU/DQE (French price schedule). The prices are entirely simulated: they do not come from a supplier quote and do not reflect market rates. The table for the buyer is kept separate from the company's internal calculations.
€120,000 excl. VAT
Ceiling for the lot over its entire term. Not a spending commitment.
€19,153.92 excl. VAT, fictitious
Simulated comparative DQE basket, not guaranteed annual revenue.
RadarPublic fees are separate
Scope, capacity and quote remain to be confirmed. This example sets no support fee.
| Line | Site | DQE qty | Fictitious unit price | Fictitious total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L3-01 | Gymnase David Douillet | 2 | 660.00 | 1,320.00 |
| L3-02 | Tennis | 2 | 240.63 | 481.26 |
| L3-03 | Piscine municipale | 2 | 825.00 | 1,650.00 |
| L3-04 | Futur gymnase | 2 | 660.00 | 1,320.00 |
| L3-05 | École élémentaire Francis et Odette Teisseyre | 2 | 653.13 | 1,306.26 |
| L3-06 | École maternelle Francis et Odette Teisseyre | 2 | 488.13 | 976.26 |
| L3-07 | Restaurant scolaire Francis et Odette Teisseyre | 2 | 323.13 | 646.26 |
| L3-08 | Accueil de loisirs Papillons des champs | 2 | 323.13 | 646.26 |
| L3-09 | École élémentaire Jean-Louis Étienne | 2 | 653.13 | 1,306.26 |
| L3-10 | École maternelle Jean-Louis Étienne | 2 | 488.13 | 976.26 |
| L3-11 | Restaurant scolaire Jean-Louis Étienne | 2 | 323.13 | 646.26 |
| L3-12 | Accueil de loisirs Coccinelles des bois | 2 | 323.13 | 646.26 |
| L3-13 | Groupe scolaire 3 | 1 | 907.50 | 907.50 |
| L3-14 | Services techniques | 2 | 323.13 | 646.26 |
| L3-15 | Hôtel de ville | 2 | 405.63 | 811.26 |
| L3-16 | Espace jeunesse | 2 | 240.63 | 481.26 |
| L3-17 | Police municipale | 2 | 240.63 | 481.26 |
| L3-18 | Salle polyvalente | 2 | 323.13 | 646.26 |
| L3-19 | Salle de la Ferme | 2 | 323.13 | 646.26 |
| L3-20 | Salle des Écuries | 2 | 323.13 | 646.26 |
| L3-21 | Salle de spectacles de l’Atmosphère et loges | 2 | 660.00 | 1,320.00 |
| L3-22 | Salle associative du couvent | 2 | 323.13 | 646.26 |
| Total of the fictitious basket | 19,153.92 | |||
GS3: a single potential visit over the entire term, even though the DQE column is labelled annual. No annualisation and no multiplication by renewals. VAT and VAT-inclusive amounts are not calculated until the actual VAT regime is established.
Download the 22 lines with fictitious prices as CSV (in French)The analysis must also reveal the showstoppers
- Mandatory site visit and deadline missed: writing a technical proposal does not make the application admissible.
- Different signature instructions on different pages of the RC: flag the discrepancy, without silently accepting or interpreting the clauses.
- GS3 quantity and a generic annual flat-rate heading in the AE: clarify how they are treated before any real commitment.
- Missing references, insurance, products, powers of attorney and administrative documents: no evidence is fabricated.
Example prepared from the municipal documents consulted on 1 November 2026. Not all amendments and answers on the buyer profile were cross-checked. It is not an exhaustive legal or technical validation.
Read the official documents on the municipality's website (in French)The right tender for the right company
We match the subject, the territory, the requirements and the size of the lot against the company's activities and evidence. An unmet mandatory condition means not bidding; missing information remains to be confirmed. A score is no substitute for insurance or a reference.
The intended automated preparation tracks the documents and their versions, the requirements cited, the evidence supplied, the sections of the technical proposal and the calculations. The example does not yet prove complete extraction or autonomous delivery in production.
Do you have a tender and a current need?
Send us the link to the tender, your activity, the deadline and the help you need. Your support budget is optional. Please avoid confidential documents in this first exchange. The analysis may conclude that bidding is not worthwhile, or limit our involvement to studying the file.
Present my request to RadarPublicOrder the full bid file — €490 excl. VATStart with a Go / No-go review — €49 excl. VAT, within 2 working days
Order the bid file at least 7 working days before the deadline. Not sure yet? Start with the Go / No-go review: within 2 working days you know whether bidding is worth it.
Your email program prepares the request; you decide whether to send it. It is not a purchase or a newsletter subscription.